The Roles Financial Services Firms Cannot Find Fast Enough
There is a set of roles sitting at the centre of almost every major financial services transformation programme right now. They are not traditional roles. They did not exist as defined job descriptions three years ago. And the market is not producing them fast enough.
60%
rise in demand for model risk and AI governance roles in UK financial services.
Why are these roles so hard to find?
The roles creating the most acute pressure in FS right now sit at intersections. They require two or three distinct sets of knowledge that have never traditionally sat in the same person.
A model risk manager who understands AI is not the same as a traditional model risk manager. A change director who can manage a DORA obligation alongside a live AI deployment needs skills that did not co-exist in a single role until recently.
The market has not caught up. Universities are not producing these profiles at scale. Traditional career paths do not create them naturally. And the firms that recognised this earliest are now competing for very different candidates than those realising it now.
Which roles are under the most pressure right now?
Model risk managers with AI context
Traditional model risk managers are well established in financial services, particularly in insurance and banking. But AI changes the nature of the role significantly.
AI models are trained on dynamic data, operate at speed and scale that static actuarial models never did, and require oversight frameworks that simply did not exist five years ago. The people who understand both the traditional governance baseline and what AI changes about it are genuinely scarce.
AI governance leads who can bridge innovation and compliance
Most firms have compliance professionals. Most have technologists driving AI adoption. Very few have people who can sit credibly in both worlds, understand the commercial imperative to move quickly and the regulatory obligation to document and evidence every decision.
The governance question is not whether to have a framework. It is whether you have the person who can run it without becoming a barrier to the work it is supposed to enable.
Change directors managing regulatory delivery alongside live AI programmes
DORA, the EU AI Act and FCA Consumer Duty all require active programme management, not just policy compliance. The directors who can run that alongside a live AI deployment, managing regulatory scrutiny and commercial delivery at the same time, are a small and heavily competed-for group.
Data and AI leads who can fix quality and build capability in parallel
Poor data quality is one of the most consistent barriers to AI at scale. The instinct to fix everything before starting leads to paralysis. The people who can improve data quality and AI capability simultaneously, understanding both the technical constraints and the business processes generating the data, sit at another scarce intersection.
Workforce Readiness for AI in Financial Services
Get the Whitepaper and Score Your Organisation
Why does hiring timeline matter so much right now?
Three to six months is the realistic timeline to hire for most of these roles. That is not slow by recruitment standards. But it is a long time when a programme is already live and a governance gap is already forming.
- Firms mid-programme facing a capability gap today are already behind the schedule they need
- Hiring under urgency costs more and produces worse outcomes than planned hiring
- The premium for these profiles increases when demand spikes, which it is doing now
The firms in the strongest position built non-traditional pipelines before they needed them. They worked with partners who knew where these intersectional profiles existed, what motivated them and how long it realistically took to bring them in.
That is a different conversation from a standard recruitment brief. And it starts before urgency forces the issue.
Workforce Readiness for AI in Financial Services
If this raises questions about your own position, the full whitepaper goes further.
It covers the Execution Readiness Diagnostic, scorecard, readiness profiles and seven strategic questions.
Frequently Asked Questions
What AI roles are hardest to hire for in UK financial services?
Model risk managers with AI governance experience, AI governance leads who bridge compliance and innovation, change directors with DORA delivery experience, and data leads who can build AI capability and improve data quality simultaneously. All have typical hiring timelines of three to six months.
Why is AI governance so hard to staff in financial services?
AI governance requires a combination of regulatory knowledge, technical AI literacy and the interpersonal authority to hold the line between innovation and compliance. That combination is genuinely new and the market has not yet produced it at scale.
How long does it take to hire specialist AI roles in financial services?
Three to six months is realistic for the highest-demand profiles. Firms that are already mid-programme and facing a gap are behind the timeline they need. The cost and difficulty of hiring increases significantly under urgency.
What is a model risk manager and why does AI change the role?
A model risk manager is responsible for overseeing how quantitative models are developed, validated and used in decision-making. AI changes the role because AI models operate on dynamic data at speed and scale that traditional actuarial models never did, requiring new governance frameworks and a different set of oversight skills.
--------------------
We're committed to enabling our clients and candidates to thrive in a constantly changing world. By helping businesses grow and supporting people in leading more fulfilling lives both at work and beyond, we aim to make a lasting impact. Our ultimate goal is to become the world’s most valued and trusted workforce solutions company, trusted by our people, our clients and our communities.
Our latest insights
