Should we expect more regulatory scrutiny in the new norm?

18 May 2020

​Since the pandemic took hold, I have written about my expectations of the new norm including more remote working, an increase in investment in automation, reduction in the use of cash and more robust contingency planning to protect organisations from future crises.


As we know, over the past few years, regulatory compliance has been steadily rising, with regulation tightening not just in the UK and Europe, but across the world.


During COVID-19, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has relaxed its regulations for financial firms by easing best execution reporting requirements and extending financial reporting deadlines. However, a lot of my network from the Financial Services sector is anticipating even more regulatory scrutiny and compliance in the new norm.


During the outbreak, compliance teams have had to adapt quickly to the new realities of working from home, and the challenges they have faced particularly when people have been unable to work due to illness. Smaller firms have been more susceptible to breaches in regulation due to key members of staff falling ill or being furloughed.


Manual processes are difficult to maintain at the best of times. These limitations to current processes have been magnified during COVID-19 and have highlighted the need for enhanced online systems and secure, cloud-based technology so compliance work can continue without interruption.


Services that are automated, with cost-effective advantages, are going to be of incredible value to most firms to help relieve the regulatory burden. The more they can automate, or outsource, the more protected they will be, mitigating the risk of fines from regulatory breaches.


Compliance is important. Firms will be very aware that an economic downturn will not be an excuse for any breach. As COVID-19 has highlighted weaknesses in process, is it also likely we will see regulatory changes implemented to business continuity planning and standards to address these?

Our latest insights

by Alex Lawrence 13 February 2026
On paper, today’s life sciences talent market looks favourable. Application volumes are up, redundancies have increased, AI makes it easier than ever for candidates to tailor CVs to roles. And yet many HR and TA leaders across EMEA are saying the same thing: hiring feels harder, not easier. When volume stops being helpful For many roles, hundreds of applications have become the norm. But volume has not brought clarity. Instead, it has created noise. AI-enhanced CVs blur differentiation. Screening effort increases. Interviewers struggle to distinguish genuine capability from polished narratives. Decision-making slows, or worse, becomes intuitive rather than evidence-based. The risk isn’t missing talent. It’s selecting candidates who look right on paper but struggle once inside lean, high-pressure teams. Speed isn’t the goal. Clarity is. In response, many organisations try to accelerate. Shorter timelines. Fewer interview stages. Faster decisions. But speed without clarity doesn’t reduce risk. It amplifies it. The organisations hiring most effectively today aren’t the fastest, they’re the most disciplined. They: Define requirements tightly Align interviewers on what “good” looks like Use structured, evidence-led assessment Reduce ambiguity rather than rushing decisions In this environment, clarity creates speed , not the other way around.
by Alex Lawrence 9 February 2026
Lean hiring in EMEA life sciences is not about doing the same with fewer people. Organisations need to evolve from hiring for certainty to uncertainty and capability
by Rowena To 30 January 2026
Introducing Neisha Joseph
by Stephanie Bruckl 26 January 2026
Introducing Sinead Murphy – Global General Counsel, Investment Banking, HSBC
Show More